From Cloudflare’s headline-making takedown of the Daily Stormer last autumn to YouTube’s summer restrictions on LGBTQ content, there’s been a surge in “voluntary” platform censorship. Companies—under pressure from lawmakers, shareholders, and the public alike—have ramped up restrictions on speech, adding new rules, adjusting their still-hidden algorithms and hiring more staff to moderate content. They have banned ads from certain sources and removed “offensive” but legal content.
These moves come in the midst of a fierce public debate about what responsibilities platform companies that directly host our speech have to take down—or protect—certain types of expression. And this debate is occurring at a time in whoch only a few large companies host most of our online speech. Under the First Amendment, intermediaries generally have a right to decide what kinds of expression they will carry. But just because companies can act as judge and jury doesn’t mean they should.
OpenAI och Jony Ive berättar lite mer om sitt gemensamma AI-projekt
OpenAI-chefen Sam Altman och Apples tidigare chefsdesigner Jony Ive möttes inför 1 500 utvecklare i San Francisco för ett samtal om deras gemensamma projekt: en ny familj av AI-drivna enheter som ska förändra relationen mellan människor och teknik. Samarbetet, som…
0 kommentarer